Lord Ayyappa's temple at Sabarimala.
India Supreme Court

Top Court To Consider Petitions For Changing Sabarimala Verdict Today

The Supreme Court will consider today a batch of petitions seeking the recall of the constitution bench verdict allowing the entry of women in the age group of 10 to 50 years at Lord Ayyappa’s temple at Sabarimala.

The bench of Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi and Justices Rohinton Fali Nariman, AM Khanwilkar, DY Chandrachud and Indu Malhotra would consider the review petitions in their chambers at 3 pm.

Besides this, four more petitions relating to Sabarimala temple are listed for hearing today by a bench comprising Chief Justice Gogoi and Justices Sanjay Kishan Kaul and KM Joseph.

National Association of Ayyappa Devotees, Nair Service Society, and 17 other organisations have moved the review petition seeking recall of the September 28 verdict.

The five-judge Constitution Bench headed by then Chief Justice Dipak Misra had junked the age-old tradition of the Lord Ayyappa temple by a majority verdict of 4:1.

It said that the ban on women in menstruating age group, whose presence at the Sabarimala temple was considered “impure”, violated their fundamental rights and constitutional guarantee of equality.

The review plea by the Nair Service Society (NSS), one of the petitioners, said “without holding that the questions raised related to matters of religion which are not within judicially manageable standards, the majority decision in substance has the effect of holding that the character of the deity can be altered based on individual faith and belief, in violation of the tenets of a particular religion and or religious sect”.

The petitioners have also alleged that the verdict has “legal errors” and the assumption of the temple practice being based on notions of menstrual impurity is “factually erroneous”.

The NSS had said in the plea that as the deity is a ‘Naistika Brahmachari’ or celibate, females below the age of 10 and after the age of 50 years are eligible to worship him and there is no practice of excluding worship by females.

“Hence, the delay or wait for 40 years to worship cannot be considered as exclusionary and it is an error of law on the face of the judgement,” the plea said.




News credit : Msn.com

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *